• octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    2 days ago

    That sounds like a great way to go, but if the past four years have taught me anything it’s that I shouldn’t expect much of anything in the way of lasting consequences or impediments for Republicans from our courts.

    I’ll get excited when there are some arrests.

    • just_another_person@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      Have you noticed how stuck and stalled the Trump admin is right now? This is why. It’s working. We’re not even to the first court confrontation yet, which is due tomorrow. We need to see how far the judicitbranch is willing to go to issue punitive measures and enforce these things before we start crying that nothing is working.

      This is the process in the US. It’s worked pretty well against other bad actors, and we need to give it some time to play out as defined in due process before more drastic measures.

      • Jhex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        We need to see how far the judicitbranch is willing to go to issue punitive measures and enforce these things before we start crying that nothing is working.

        Sorry to be skeptical bud but we got 4 years to prosecute Trump on his many many crimes when he was not protected by his King of America title and literally NOTHING happened to him…

        You can sit and wait until the very last shred of the judicial systems shows you it has failed… by then 2 things would be true: 1) apparently you’ll be convinced and 2) you won’t have a country anymore

          • Jhex@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            Oh come on… they delayed every step of the way until Trump won again and now claim they cannot impose any sentence

            also, it absolutely is the judicial branch’s responsibility to prosecute crimes… that is why gov attorneys are referred to as “prosecutors”

        • just_another_person@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          2 days ago

          Then you haven’t been paying attention. I’ve said this a million times before for people saying what you’re saying: the executive has less far reaching power than Congress or Judicial for a reason. This is that reason.

          Judges can arrest anyone attempting to enforce these fake proclamations that are illegal.

          Judges can seize assets from private banks.

          Judges can put anyone in jail that refuses to comply, and Trump can’t pardon them.

          If these rules don’t hold them there is no constitutional agreement that states need to abide, and they all immediately assume control of military assets in said states. That’s the end of the US, and an immediate assault and destruction of Trump and his psychos in DC.

          They won’t even try to push that. They know what will happen.

          • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            24
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            Judges can arrest anyone attempting to enforce these fake proclamations that are illegal.

            Judges can seize assets from private banks.

            Judges can put anyone in jail that refuses to comply, and Trump can’t pardon them.

            Like the judges who could have locked him up before the election?

            I don’t think you are hearing what I’m saying. My faith in our institutions is done. Kaput. I will happily eat a serving of crow if needed, but that’s gonna have to be a good sales pitch because if our institutions worked we wouldn’t be where we are today. We couldn’t stop Trump when he had zero executive power and was not the president.

            Meanwhile, we’re barely a month in: https://www.project2025.observer/

            edited to clarify wording of one sentence

            • just_another_person@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              30
              ·
              2 days ago

              You don’t have a basic understanding of that concept or the Judicial system. Not even worth responding when you come with a fundamental idiotic understanding of how this works.

              • Bo7a@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 day ago

                Where the fuck have you been for the last 10 years? Why do you believe that laws, norms, and rules, mean anything to this gang of fucking thieves?

          • dhork@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            14
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            2 days ago

            Judges can issue orders for all that, but they have no enforcement mechanism of their own. Enforcement of orders is done through bodies like the US Marshals, which are ultimately under the executive branch. What happens if a judge issues a ruling, but the President instructs everyone under him not to enforce it?

            • just_another_person@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              12
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              You’re wrong. Not only wrong, but for some reason bringing up a federal law enforcement agency that most states don’t even allow to operate as intended. You can watch videos about this on YouTube if you want.

              I’m sure you’ve seen these true crime shows on TV where people are immediately taken into custody in court and sent straight to jail if found guilty. Without me going into a civics lesson, if a judge declares you guilty of a crime, law enforcement has to incarcerate you. That is the LAW part of government.

              The local police are the enforcement army of this, even for federal Judges who operate at a local level.

              A judge finds you guilty of a crime, your are arrested and go to jail.

              This is where contempt of court comes in. If you refuse to comply with a court order, you are immediately arrested and put in jail. You are held in contempt of court for not complying with a court order. This is not under the purview of state or federal law for pardons because there is no crime committed, you are being held in contempt of court, a branch of government.

              A federal judge who is telling Trump’s lackeys to stop what they are doing can absolutely fire off a number of contempt charges that Trump can’t intervene with.

              Elon doesn’t comply? Freeze his banking assets.

              DOJ head doesn’t comply , assume judgement and have her arrested if she steps foot in the judge’s territory.

              On and on until they comply.

              What you’re clearly not understanding is that a single judge can destroy this cabinet by simple levers provided by the constitution, and take any of the low level people into jail or also freeze their assets if they don’t comply.

              DOGE employee: jail and frozen assets

              Local Podunk Texas cop who refuses to enforce: jail and frozen assets.

              It’s all the way down until people comply with the LAW, and the judges enforce these laws.

              • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 day ago

                A judge finds you guilty of a crime, your are arrested and go to jail.

                DOGE employee: jail and frozen assets

                Local Podunk Texas cop who refuses to enforce: jail and frozen assets.

                Former President Convicted of 34 Felonies: No Restrictions

                Justice Juan Merchan followed through on a promise made one week ago to give Trump a sentence of unconditional discharge, which includes neither jail time nor any other restriction that might impede Trump after his inauguration on Jan. 20.

                THIS is what we’re all screaming at you while you ask if we ever took a civics class.

                TRUMP IS ABOVE THE LAW and he was above the law before he even took office this time around.

                We’re all handwaving away your assurances because they are all about things that CAN happen in a world where people are following the rules and things work like they should. A world that no longer exists.

                  • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 day ago

                    When they do, I’ll come back to acknowledge I was wrong. In the meantime, I’m not holding my breath. 4 years of that was enough.

                    You’re missing the point.

                    No, you are missing mine.

                    My point is that nothing that happened with Trump over the course of four years that gives me ANY confidence regarding how the system will work now. (see 34 felonies case)

                    Your “well okay, Trump is above the law, but the folks below him might not be” is not the confidence builder you seem to think it is. When folks start going to jail (and staying there) I’ll share your enthusiasm.

                    Edit: And it doesn’t count if they are going to jail after we’ve reached the “rebuilding our nation from rubble” stage.

            • just_another_person@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 day ago

              Two reasons:

              1. President can only pardon federal convictions
              2. Contempt is not a conviction. It’s a power of the courts to compel compliance.