• Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    8 days ago

    What the fuck is that stock image? They really said “contemplating suicide but make it corporate”.

  • Otter@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 days ago

    I went to grab Bobby Tables and found this new variation

    • Flax@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      Isn’t it actually illegal to call your child “null” or “nil” in some places

      • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        It depends on where you live. Some regions have a limited list of acceptable names, some places just have limited lists of unacceptable names, but I can’t find anywhere that explicitly bans Null.

        It does suck to be named Null, though. It’s like two steps down from not being given a social security number as an infant

      • qarbone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        I’m confused by this comment. “The original is even better” reads like you are informing TO about the original. But you’d expect them to be aware of it, what with them referencing the joke nickname and saying “a new variation”.

        It’s mostly confusing because there are clearer ways of posting the original comic for the uninformed than referencing the only person certain to have seen it.

      • bleistift2@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        Because it’s the most efficient. With students handing in AI theses, it’s only sensible to have teachers use AI to grade them. No we only need to have teachers use AI to create exam questions and education becomes a fully automated process. Then everyone can go home early.

  • vfsh@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    I did this to myself last week on a new project. Spent an hour trying to track down at what point in my code the data from the database got converted to [Object object]. Finally decided to check the db itself and realized that the [Object object] was coming from inside the house the whole time and the error in my code was when the entry was being written smh

    • Lightfire228@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      Sanity checks

      Always, always check if your assumptions are true

      • am i even running the function?
      • is this value what i think it is?
      • what is responsible for loading this data, and does it work as expected?
      • am i pointed at the right database?
      • is my configuration set and loaded in correctly?