data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1f98a/1f98accb0c3457d0c54e64e98c7c0ebc83540966" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/46069/460692bda71b4646fdb0a688218881341e90297a" alt=""
I feel like I’m taking crazy pills. There’s so many comments on there being like “oooooh they didn’t expect her to have that much evidence. Get WRECKED libs.” How can anyone see that and genuinely think any evidence of any type of fraud was provided in any way? Like the reporter immediately said afterwards, this all just looks like spending that they don’t like and somehow that proves it as fraudulent.
Somebody make it make sense. How are these adults.
With most things like this, I truly, honestly think the man is just too dumb to carry out what he’s accused of. Now, stupidity is absolutely not an excuse to get you out of the dumb shit you’ve done (in fact, it now seems to be a prerequisite for his position along with being incredibly wealthy and comically old), but I don’t think he’s behind a lot of these elaborate plans he’s accused of.
I think at the end of the day, he’s just a very old, very rich, incredibly gullible and dumb man who is very easily controlled by those around him.