Assuming disabled people must have voted for Trump and therefore get what they deserve is disingenuous.
Worst case scenario, they’re unable to meet the physical restrictions of voting imposed in red states and didn’t vote. That still doesn’t mean they deserve it.
Removed, not an article, not US politics.
“Scaramucci did not elaborate on what he believes that “hold” might be, adding only: “I don’t know why it’s like this. [H.R.] McMaster couldn’t figure it out, [James] Mattis couldn’t figure it out, [John] Kelly couldn’t figure it out.”
We know for a fact, thanks to the Mueller Report, that the Pee Tapes mentioned in the Steele Dossier do, in fact, exist. They’re fake, but they exist.
"According to a footnote in the special counsel’s report, which was released Thursday, Michael Cohen, Trump’s former personal lawyer, received a text from Russian businessman Giorgi Rtskhiladze in October 2016 that said: “Stopped flow of tapes from Russia but not sure if there’s anything else. Just so you know…”
Rtskhiladze also told prosecutors that he was told the tapes were fake, but that he didn’t convey that to Cohen.
And again, read the sticky at the top of the group.
Social media links, videos, reddit, etc. are not allowed here.
Blog sites aren’t valid sources. See the note at the top of the community.
Not an article. Removed.
A little bit less than that… DOGE is claiming they found $55B in savings, Trump wants to kick back 20% to taxpayers.
So 20% of 55B = 11B.
164 million taxpayers:
https://www.forbes.com/advisor/taxes/taxes-statistics/
So $11B/164M = $67 each.
OTOH… DOGE hasn’t actually found $55B, best anyone can figure it’s more like $2B.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/doge-wall-of-receipts-shows-errors-tallying-billions-in-savings/
So running the same formula, 20% of 2B = $400,000,000 / 164M = $2.44 per taxpayer.
You’re not wrong, but self/image posts are not allowed. See !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world
Blurb is fine! No worries there, but the headline is the important bit.
When posting to Lemmy, remember that each community has their own rules. Make sure you read the sidebar on each before posting.
Editorialized headlines aren’t allowed, please revert to the original or we’ll have to remove it.
"Who’s Afraid of Hasan Piker?
He’s hot. He’s “dangerous.” Young men actually listen to him. Is he what Democrats are looking for?"
Video links are not allowed.
Best 45 minutes you can spend today.
If you don’t have that kind of time. 1:01:
I think challenging them to do so definitely opens that door.
“But what is the other explanation?”
When it all goes wrong, and everyone has to Make Attorneys Get Attorneys, you need low level plebes to fall on their swords.
“Hey, hey, it wasn’t ME! It was THIS GUY!”
We’re already seeing it with Musk and the whole “Well, he doesn’t REALLY run DOGE.”
No, but you don’t challenge them to investigate you, because they absolutely will.
Ooh, politicians should never make challeges like that…
https://www.history.com/news/gary-hart-scandal-front-runner
“Follow me around,” The New York Times Magazine reported him saying just a few weeks after he declared his candidacy. “I don’t care. I’m serious. If anybody wants to put a tail on me, go ahead. They’d be very bored.”
Image/shitposting not allowed.
Again, there’s no evidence from the article that the disabled people in question voted in ANY WAY, much less that they voted for Trump.
That’s why your assumption they did is disingenuous.
If the article were about disabled Trump voters, then you’d have a point. It’s not.