Summary

Donald Trump dodged questions about whether U.S. foreign policy aligns with Russia, deflecting with a rambling response that avoided addressing concerns about his stance on Ukraine.

He again claimed that he could quickly end the war and blamed Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy for suggesting peace remains distant.

Meanwhile, his administration is reportedly preparing to lift sanctions on Russian individuals and entities.

Critics argue Trump’s position emboldens Russia while undermining Ukraine, raising fears about U.S. commitment to countering Russian aggression.

  • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    5 hours ago

    We have known he has avoided this question since 2016: “No puppet, no puppet, you’re the puppet”

  • snooggums@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    86
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    He again claimed that he could quickly end the war and blamed Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy for suggesting peace remains distant.

    Trump’s plan is for Ukraine to surrender to Russia, which is why everything he does is in favor of Russia.

  • Thrillhouse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    62
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Journalists still aren’t asking hard enough questions.

    “Why would you possibly think you are the only one who can get a deal done with Russia? It doesn’t seem to be about a lack of respect for other world leaders because you’re already capitulating to what Russia, the global pariah wants, without getting anything in return. Doesn’t seem like good deal making or putting “America” first. Your comment.”

    “Are you saying Benjamin Netanyahu is weak by insinuating October 7th happened because you weren’t in Office? Or are you just mad that civilians in Gaza weren’t genocided fast enough?”

    • gadfly1999@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      5 hours ago

      It hardly matters. That was a question with a simple answer and he just veered right around it with his usual verbal diarrhea.

      The only time he gives out a straightforward answer is when he accidentally says the truth.

    • Ghyste@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      7 hours ago

      He won’t let a journalist speak for that long. He’ll cut them off, give some 3rd grade insult about how they’re “nasty” or something then move on without answering anything.

      • Thrillhouse@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        7 hours ago

        They need to push. If he’s finding the thinnest of excuses to ban the AP they should give him a real reason to ban them. Watching in Canada it’s worse than a train wreck in slow motion like someone please grow a spine.

        The only ones saying or doing anything remotely of substance are Bernie, Crockett and AOC and it’s still not enough.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      Journalists still aren’t asking hard enough questions.

      The goal isn’t to get real information out of this administration, because there’s no serious anticipation of a public response. Congress isn’t going to stop him. The courts aren’t going to stop him. So the real job of the journalists isn’t to inform but to infotain.

      That’s why you get these dipshit attention grabbing click-bait headlines.

      “Are you saying Benjamin Netanyahu is weak by insinuating October 7th happened because you weren’t in Office? Or are you just mad that civilians in Gaza weren’t genocided fast enough?”

      You’re not going to Own Trump with this line of questioning. He’s just going to bullshit you and retort in kind as he did with the original questions. On top of that, the question implies there’s something wrong with Netanyahu and Israel, which means AIPAC staffers will be making a thousand angry calls to your bosses while Bill Akman tries to get investors to pull out of your employer’s parent company. You only get to ask questions like this when your journal is truly independent. And Trump won’t take questions from those organizations, unless they’re sycophantic.

      All you can do is attack Trump directly, indulge him in the pageantry and theater of an interview, and then report breathlessly that you got to talk to The Man Himself while his friendly journals report breathlessly that he survived another assassination attempt by the Far-Left Anti-American Pro-War Press.

      The idea of media as an organizing tool and a means of mobilizing large groups to engage in a public project is totally gone from these stories. There’s no voice of the opposition. There’s no call to action. There’s no vision of a better future. It’s got all the political consequence of a wrestling match, right down to the scripted calls and responses.

      • Thrillhouse@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Interesting comments.

        I think some of the interviews he did in the first term hurt him like the Axios one.

        I’m hoping that as he continues to mentally slip, which is clear when you go back and watch campaign video even from 2016, he’s going to say something so nasty and inexcusable that the non-cultists will be upset and take action. Or it will become very clear - like it did with Biden - that he’s so far gone. Trump just hides it better for now under stimulants, anger, and unpredictability.

        It’s a long shot but they have to keep trying. Or else what is there? Roll over and let him declare himself president for life without much of a fight?

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          5 hours ago

          Or else what is there? Roll over and let him declare himself president for life without much of a fight?

          If you want to oppose Trump, interview the opposition. There are plenty in the Ukranian ex-pat community willing to lend a word, especially people with homes currently under Russian occupation who will have nowhere to return to if Trump signs away the Donbas or forces Zelenskyy into grand new bulk real estate privatization schemes that foreclose on all the public apartments and offices and industries still in western control. Some of the most powerful advocates for Gaza have been American refugees forced out of Palestine (the TV show Mo, for instance, has provided a very stark spotlight on the life of stateless Palestinians).

          You could also go to European delegates and discuss how people much closer to the front lines would like to see the Ukraine/Russia war end. You could reach out to American diplomats who predate the Trump inauguration, including ones he’s fired, and describe how he’s shifted the direction of foreign policy since taking office. Hell, you could even reach out to a few Russian diplomats to get them on record with what they’re actually demanding, rather than going to Trump and asking him whether he thinks he’s giving Moscow too much.

          Talk to academics with more foreign policy experience. Talk to international trade reps who recognize what these sanctions mean for trade and travel through the region. Talk to people living in the Crimea or South Ossetia or Chechnya to see what a prolonged Russian occupation looks like.

          You could talk to people who are working towards a different outcome - civil groups in the US lobbying for Zelenskyy to continue fighting, NGOs invested in a different peace plan, Russian and Ukrainian ex-pats who are surviving off the front lines or are fleeing conscription or who have family fighting or lost in the conflict.

          Then maybe even highlight how readers can contribute to efforts to provide relief or buttress support or just reach out and learn more from the organizations doing this various lobbying efforts. Describe American-based organizations that are housing refugees or working towards long term resettlement. Give readers an opportunity to engage with the news rather than just passively observing it.

          So many people to talk to who aren’t Trump. All of them would provide more useful information to describe the state of the war and the consequences of the new policies.

          • Thrillhouse@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            4 hours ago

            I appreciate all of the ideas and I do think they’re solid. How does anyone reach the US citizens who don’t pay attention to the news or who don’t think this is a big deal. It’s probably a pretty significant overlap between Fox Propaganda viewers / Soft Republican and/or Swing voters / and the generally disengaged. I don’t think these people are necessarily listening to Ukrainian or Gaza voices or consuming long-form/thoughtful journalism. I do think it’s happening slowly. The town halls are a good start.

            I don’t want to see people go through pain. And I don’t want the propagandists to try to blame international countries for the sadism that the US government is inflicting on their own people. How do you get through to people? It’s so weird to see how fractured it is.

            It’s so ridiculous. There are enough resources globally for everyone. There are just too many billionaires gobbling everything up.

            • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              4 hours ago

              How does anyone reach the US citizens who don’t pay attention to the news or who don’t think this is a big deal.

              The “person who doesn’t pay attention to news” isn’t monolithic or intransigent. People get caught up in waves of enthusiasm and disappointment year to year. The 2020 turnout high water mark was driven in large part by the degree to which material conditions were dire and access to the ballot was made unusually easy (via universal mail-in voting). Participation surged during the mini-recession and quarantine in no small part because so many people had tons of free time to burn on activism.

              Conservative media fixation on the border, on transgender athletics, and on mask defiance all galvanized support for their candidates by engaging with people in a way they could actively respond. You could literally pick up a gun and drive down to South Texas and join a militia. You could go to your local middle school soccer game with a bunch of Moms For Liberty and start clocking 13-year-old athletes. You could show up at a grocery store and start screaming at clerks when they asked you to put on a mask, then film it and post to TikTok or Reddit or wherever, to prove how Based you were.

              This inflated support for Trump’s MAGA contingent, both in the primaries and the general, relative to his middling 2016 performance. Biden only one by outpacing him with a liberal response. And when that response collapsed in 2024 (in no small part thanks to Biden and Harris kicking the legs out of it by pandering exclusively to neocon swing voters), Trump was able to claim the first Republican majority-vote win in twenty years.

              I don’t want to see people go through pain.

              Luigi Mangione Noises

              I want to see a re-balancing of the scales and a serious effort at social justice. I don’t want to see Donald Trump walk away from a conviction in federal court with no penalty because judges and prosecutors are too terrified of reprisal. I don’t want to see people who spent the last five years warmongering to walk away unsinged and free to play these sick games again.

              How do you get through to people?

              Operating as a stenographier for a notorious liar and bullshit artist is not the way forward.

              Not even if you can put “Haha! We owned him!” in the headlines.

  • Theoriginalthon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Why don’t the journalists just keep asking the same question over and over again until he gives a semi coherent answer, some like, going back to the previous question can you please clarify your answer, or would that lead to a chatgpt style meltdown

    • gadfly1999@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 hours ago

      That would be great but for the fact that he’s just going to shut out anyone that challenges him and one day his press conference will be filled up with Fox News and Newsmax sycophants.

    • Shawdow194@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Thank you! Trump dodging the questions entirely time and time again needs to be addressed

  • Habarug@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    6 hours ago

    How people can watch this and see anything other than a rambling old man is beyond me

  • Makeitstop@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    7 hours ago

    In response, Trump rattled off a list of everything that “would have never happened” if he’d won the presidential election four years ago.

    Trump’s nonanswer, which veered further and further off-topic, included the October 7 massacre, “Israel,” inflation, the withdrawal of U.S. forces from Afghanistan, and China possessing the Bagram Air Base (the Taliban has denied that China controls the former U.S. base). Finally, he circled back to Ukraine—but only to complain, not to actually answer the question.

    Obviously he was never going to withdraw troops from Afghanistan. Why would he? He’s only the one who negotiated the withdrawal.

  • snekerpimp@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    7 hours ago

    When do people start standing outside his house with pitchforks and torches? He is an obvious traitor and insurrectionist, a puppet of a foreign power. He is actively gargling on Putan’s balls and everyone is standing around shock faced, looking at each other, hoping someone else finds a way to fight him in court. This will not be stopped in the courts, or with legislation, or with talking. Show of might and force from the American people, standing up for what WE THE PEOPLE want, is what is necessary, at this point.

    Would not be surprised if there is an executive order to rename America to New Russia at this point. If musk has a say, I guess Dark Russia would be on the table too.

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    6 hours ago

    He again claimed that he could quickly end the war

    More likely he was ordered to end the war by his master and commander Putin.

  • zephorah@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 hours ago

    New Republic just feeds the echo chamber. They’re interpreting mood and motive based on pausing, for starters.

    Remember, this rag feeds echo chambers their headlines.